In my role as Lead for Academic Integrity, I am frequently asked by staff about how they can catch students cheating using generative AI. I use an example of a paragraph that I have paraphrased, alongside two other examples where I have used ChatGPT and Quillbot to make the paragraph more academic and the original text, to help open the discussion about what they think is appropriate use. As part of the activity, we create a cline of acceptability where they consider what is and what is not acceptable. It is often also a useful introduction to them to understand what generative AI can do as well as learning how to understand what would be acceptable for them professionally, what is suitable for neurodiverse students, what is acceptable for speeding up, e.g., literature review searches, etc. This activity helps staff to have less of a negative or kneejerk reaction to students using generative AI and make more informed decisions about when generative AI contributes to good academic practice or poor academic practice. The poster will show the four paragraphs, and an example cline that we produced in a Help Navigating Academic Misconduct staff training workshop.